Blog updates are only on an
"ad hoc" basis when I have something to say and will not be
particularly regular. Latest entries first.
has been suggested to me by several people that I should charge for my walk
information and indeed I have had unsolicited offers of payment (declined)
from people who have used my directions. I am flattered that people think it
is worth charging for but I have deliberately chosen to keep the information
free to encourage walking.
those who would still like to make a donation, you may have seen from the
Cabbage and I" page that I was unexpectedly admitted to Leeds
General Infirmary in 2014 and had a double by-pass heart operation. I had to
wait between 16 May and 6 June because an operating slot was not available.
This was a very trying, “stir crazy” period, because although I
felt perfectly well, I was evidently "too close to the edge" to be
allowed to leave. Preservation of my sanity was well assisted by facilities
provided by a charity called Take
Heart (the link will take you to their website). They provided:
television to each cardiac ward bed (which normally costs around £5 per
phone calls to land lines
TV lounge area with a wide screen TV
roof garden with stunning views over Leeds which provided somewhere to sit
in the sun pre-operation and a gentle exercise facility after the
It would be
appreciated if you would make any donation to them. Go via their "Can
You Help" page. Even if you think my site is rubbish, they would
still be grateful for the donation!
if you are buying anything from Amazon, if you do it via the search box on
Store page, I will get a small commission at no cost to you.
27 March 2018
Quite annoyed to discover that
the Met. Office have just decided to cease providing weather widgets which I
and am other websites use to provide weather warnings/forecasts and which I
know some visitors to my site found useful. They say:
"As part of a wider review of
services, we have made the decision to retire the Met Office forecast
location and warnings widgets."
They still provide the forecasts
but it is now less easy to drop them into websites. I have concocted a
workaround which hopefully substitute, like this.
weather station is:
For an up
to date forecast, click
15 February 2018
Evidently some clothing
manufacturers have started using magnetic catches instead of velcro/poppers.
You need to be careful if using a compass wearing such clothing and be
careful not to store any such clothing in your rucksack close to it.
Proximity to a magnet for any length of time can lead to reversal of
polarity of the compass with potentuially serious consequences! Take similar
precautions in relation to mobile phones.
6 February 2018
Just returned from 2 weeks in
Lanzarote. The first week was wonderful but the second week deteriorated
into a succession of (relatively) cold days with showers and strong gusty
winds. Unfortunately this has meant I have only added one new walk to my
Lanzarote collection. Did go on a very enjoyable wine tour though, despite
having to dodge the showers. Locals reported this was their coldest winter
weather on record!
6 January 2017
It is rather sad to have to
start the New Year with a negative blog but I have felt compelled to write
to the Lake District National Park to object to the proposals to install a
number of zip wires across Thirlmere. This is a very pretty view which
should not be spoiled by such a "theme park" style attraction but
more than that, the proposal flies in the face of the principles on which
the concept of the National Park is based, not to mention the practical
implications of adding something like 127,000 visitors a year to the very
busy A591, the primary through route of the Lake District. The full wording
of my objection is as follows. If you agree, I urge you to object too.
"To Mr Kevin Richards
Planning Reference: 7/2017/2298
Proposal: Thirlmere Activity Hub: Development of a zipwire attraction, a series of improvements to the round Thirlmere cycleway, improvements to car parks, access paths and the extension and development of an existing toilet block to provide reception, changing area and toilet facility
Location: Land at Thirlmere, St John's Castlerigg and Wythburn
In considering the above application, I urge the Lake District National Park Authority (LDNP) to reject this application and consider purposes and duties of the National Park. This is set out on the LDNP website at
“As set out in the Environment Act 1995, the Lake District National Park Authority's statutory purposes are:
To conserve and enhance the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the Lake District National Park; and
To promote opportunities for the understanding and enjoyment of the special qualities of the National Park by the public.
It also has a duty in pursuing those purposes:
To seek to foster the economic and social well being of local communities within the National Park by working closely with the agencies and local authorities responsible for these matters, but without incurring significant expenditure.”
Clearly the proposal makes no contribution at all to the first point. Whilst zip wires might provide a degree of enjoyment to some, this is absolutely not in the context of the “special qualities of the National Park” which are the natural beauty and
tranquility which the mountain and lake scenery provide.
The third point is “To seek to foster the economic and social well being of local communities”. In this context the only meaningful fostering is to provide 28 full time equivalent jobs. There will no doubt be some benefit to other businesses. There is no doubting that jobs are valuable and might be welcomed by some but the additional noise (whoops and screams of thrill seekers plus additional traffic noise) and the additional burden of 127,000 visitors to an already very busy National Park is in direct conflict with conserving and enhancing the natural beauty. As far as I know, there is no cultural heritage in zip wires!
In such cases of conflict, the Sandford Principle should apply, as enshrined in Section 62 of the Environment Act 1995. This makes clear that conservation must have priority.
In his article for the Cumbria Chamber of Commerce, “Why Cumbria Needs the Thirlmere Zip Wire” of 4 January 2018, Julian Whittle refers to the success of the Snowdonia zip wires. However this comparison fails to address the practical problems which an additional 127,000 visitors will cause to the LDNP. Snowdonia only receives 4.27 million visitors a year. The LDNP already receives 16.4 million visitors per year (4 times as many). Furthermore, the additional 127,000 are unlikely to arrive evenly spaced but will bunch at peak times, when I think it is fair to say there are already occasions where the LDNP could be regarded as “full”.
Also, the location at Thirlmere will add the extra traffic to an already very busy A591, the only direct route through the centre of the LDNP. This will obstruct LDNP residents/businesses going about their daily activities and in that context works against the principle of fostering the well being of local communities.
Rob Johnston, the Chamber’s Chief Executive downplays the negative impact of the zip wires on the appearance, peace and
tranquility of the lake by pointing out that “The landscape of Thirlmere is already hugely altered by man……” This is true but a false argument. The entire Lake District has been hugely altered by man with deforestation and sheep grazing over thousands of years. We are where we are and most importantly we like where we are
Mr Johnston points out that the A591 is “one of the busiest roads in the Lake District” and that any noise from the zip wires will be drowned out by the traffic noise. I find it a strange argument that adding to existing noise is a positive factor.
The Lake District is a beautiful and special place. It was awarded World Heritage status by UNESCO in 2017. The committee praised the area's beauty, farming and the inspiration it had provided to artists and writers. Introduction of theme park type attractions flies in the face of these qualities and the application should be rejected.
All information on this
site is given in good faith and no liability is accepted in respect of any
damage, loss or injury which might result from acting on it.